Advertise on the GDN Network
 
 
GDN Home
News Archives
Forums
Members List
Submit Article
GDN Newsletter
GDN Media Kit
Interviews
Reviews
Previews
Screenshots
GDN TV
Patches/Updates
Upcoming Releases
Publishers/Developers
Games List
Review Score Scale
Eipix
The great dilemma...
Fun -part2-...
Wolfire Games
Bands and Orchestras...
Triangle Mesh Voxelizat...
Christophor Rick
Upcoming at GDN...
Closing the door on 200...
Robert Hedlerfog
My first blog post at G...












LFG Expo


GDN Proudly Hosted
on an HWS VPS

Index » Articles Send this page to a friend
InFamous Review (PS 3)

ShareThis
Posted by James Pikover, 277 days ago
  inFAMOUS
  Articles | FAQ's & Guides | Achievements | Files | Media | Trailers | Cheats | Boards |
Amazon Buy Now | GameStop Buy Now | Online Buy Now | UK Buy Now |

On the one hand, players can be good, which means they will help downed civilians by shocking them back to health, allow enemies to live, and take the humane actions when such is called upon. In some cases, being the hero is dull, though more often than not it’s more of just being human. All of the good vs. evil decisions are completely black and white, to the extent that when important moral decisions are to be made, the game will cut to Cole thinking out loud what is good, what is bad, and the short-term benefits of both are. And after the decision is made, we’re taken out of the game again for a good ten seconds to see whether we did good or bad. How tiresome.

On the other hand, being evil requires another playthrough, at least if players wish to have all the powers available to them in the course of the campaign. In my time testing the game, I completed all but two or three side missions and still failed to earn enough experience points to purchase every last power upgrade. Sure, I could go around Empire City a few times, fighting off enemies wherever I find them, and collect the few XP points they have, but by then the experience is done and old.

Indeed, even a second playthrough, this time being inFamous, with all the evil powers instead of the good ones, felt tedious. There are only 15 missions that are morally based, 15 for both good and evil, though only one of each can be done per game. For players who enjoy the experience of the entire game but don’t need to witness everything a second time to get the full experience, inFamous is not the game for you. InFamous isn’t an RPG, it does not have enough gameplay elements to make a second playthrough worthwhile unless you really enjoy the gameplay.

 Our Rating for InFamous Review (PS 3)
4.0
Replay
Once you’ve played through, there isn’t much to go back to
8.0
Graphics
Very picturesque
8.0
Sound
Goes with the game, but nothing spectacular
7.0
Gameplay
10-15 hours of solid gameplay
0.0
Multiplayer
Not Available
7.5
Overall
Great to Rent, Poor to Pay
Comments
Rules
1. No cursing or swear words: Use proper language to express yourself.
2. No flooding or spamming the comment system, abuse will result in a ban.

You may not post comments as a guest. Please register or login to your account.
  #1 Oct 14, 2009 18:00:00 160 days ago

DrkrZen
1 Comments
Its really too bad that reviews like these get added to the GameRankings totals... especially when they don’t reflect the source content sufficiently, nor do they provide correct information and even contradict themselves throughout. Besides that, the score drags down the average, compared to other, more prominent, reviewers that outnumber these reviews. Although its no wonder that this article has such a low rating when you take that into account. But hey, you can’t expect much from a site that can’t spell the name correctly of the games they review, heh.
  #2 Oct 14, 2009 18:23:09 160 days ago

Christophor Rick
18 Comments

For your information, the game name is spelled correctly and only formatted slightly wrong. According to grammatical rules it should be infamous and therefore when in the title of the article or at the beginning of a sentence. Infamous. Granted the publisher stylizes it as inFAMOUS but honestly, that doesn’t reflect in any way on the content of the review.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion and your ’more prominent’ reviewers all work for nice big corporations I’m sure who get paid lots of money and sometimes say a game is good when it’s not because if they don’t someone gets fired... or have you forgotten that incident? It wasn’t so long ago really.

If you were to average the scores (4+8+8+7)/4 = 6.75 which would get rounded up here to 7.0, I would say the reviewer was generous with the final score.

Reference our Game Scoring List - http://gamersdailynews.com/page-32.html

7 (Good): This is a solid game in a particular genre, with its flaws outweighed by what it does well in other areas. The game is at least worth a rental, if not a bargain bin purchase.

So there you go. Just pretend you’re an Olympic games judge, drop the highest and the lowest and get over it. The game has 75 reviews and an average of 86% Will you go flame Gamestyle for their 7 out of 10? How about GameShark for C+? Oh wait, Edge Magazine UK...a ’more prominent’ place... 7 out of 10 and Eurogamer, same score.

So tell me again how GDN dragged the score down?

 


 
 
Search the site:

1
Exclusive Mount & Blade Mul...
Views:
50613
2
Amy Names her Top Five Fema...
Views:
35985
3
Dragon Ball Z: Burst Limit ...
Views:
29875
4
Interview: Max Stolberg Dra...
Views:
27220
5
Why Grand Theft Auto Was Be...
Views:
22522
Interview w/ DePaul Game Elite...
Rocket Racing Review (PS Mini)
StarCraft II Wings of Liberty ...
Rage of the Gladiator Review (...
Sonic Classic Collection Revie...
Age of Zombies Review (PSP Mini)
Blue Toad Mysteries Review (PSN)
Fret Nice Review (PSN)
Fantasy Earth Zero Hand-on Pre...
Hercules XPS 2.1 40 Slim Revie...
 
Advertise | Submit News | Contact | Pages | Blogs | Forums | Downloads | Video | Privacy Policy | About Us | GDN Staff | GDN Review Scale
News & Articles RSS | News RSS | Article RSS | Video RSS | Reviews RSS
 
Check our stats at: |